We were happy to comment on the Keane report in this news piece by Martina Fitzgerald in RTE
There are two sets of statistics floating around; on one hand you have the banks who claim that they are lending and also that the demand for credit simply isn’t there – a belief further expounded by John Trethowan. Then on the other hand you have the likes of PIBA who counter claim that 80% of applications are being refused.
So it is important to break down the vital components. First of all, the debate often centres around Small Medium Enterprise (SME) lending; even if demand for that type of credit isn’t there it doesn’t automatically translate into a reduced demand for mortgages. The point being that we can’t compare SME loans/business loan demand to that for mortgage credit.
Secondly is ‘what constitutes a refusal’, and this is where common sense diverges. Even the bank accept that if you seek €200,000 and are only offered €100,000 that it is a loan not fit for purpose, this even goes …
We were delighted to take part in this months Property Segment on The Morning Show. We were talking about NAMA mortgages and the statistics on lending – are people being refused or not? Martin King and Aisling O’Loughlin were presenting, while Angela Keegan from MyHome and Karl Deeter (from here) were commenting.
There were some excellent presentations at the EHES this year, where some of the worlds leading historians, economists and economic historians gathered to share their thoughts.
The first video is excellent, Bob Allen of Oxford talks about why the Industrial Revolution was (in his opinion) a result of high wages and lower energy costs – which lead to a preference for technical innovation. Deirdre McCloskey of Chicago University offers excellent criticism in the questions at the end. Apologies for the sound quality, Bob had a tendency to move away from the mic and I wasn’t using a remote one.
In the next video Branko Milanovic talks about income distributions in the Mediterranean countries 2,000 years ago, and using very sparse data creates a compelling view of income from that time, what I took from this one was that income inequality has always been alive and well, a Roman Senator made about 500 times the wages of a regular worker (watch the video!).
Then there is a Roundtable discussion featuring the ‘who’s who’ of economic history
Feasta and the Smart Taxes Network are holding a conference on the 22nd & 23rd of September in the Mont Clare Hotel in Dublin 2. The people who work in Feasta are ideologically diverse (that is one of the things I really like about them!) and a bright bunch, the delivery, debate and data are all sure to be excellent. Hopefully we’ll see some of our readers there! (details below)
It is sure to be a treat, there are great speakers from around the world, to name a few:
Marshall Auerback (Roosevelt Institute Fellow & global portfolio strategist for Madison Street Partners, LLC) Prof. Charles Goodhart (member of the Financial Markets Group at the London School of Economics & former monetary adviser to the Bank of England) Bernard Lietaer (author of ‘The Future of Money’ & international expert in currency systems)
And of course we have our home-side team of heavyweights too! Fergal O’Brien (Chief Economist – IBEC), Richard Douthwaite (Sustainability Economist and Author), Dan …
If you look at the dynamic of the crisis to date you see the following flow (broadly but not exactly)
1. Sub-prime mortgages in the USA started to go under 2. Interbank lending froze as banks liabilities were unknown & collateral was of unknown quality 3. Interbank rates shot up 4. The crisis was not contained, culminating in the fall of Lehman which triggered a series of world events the most substantial aspect of which was a loss in confidence. 5. Markets fell rates were dropped to record lows in the EU, USA and Britain. 6. Recovery began with several bailouts in the majority of nations affected.
7. This is critical – bank and private debt effectively became public debt, in Ireland’s example this was via our banks, in other countries it was in the same manner or via quantitative easing. Across Europe the ECB was a key facilitator of liquidity.
The debt has now, in many countries become a public debt issue, in Europe specifically it is a Sovereign debt issue, the like of which the US …
You can’t hope for isolated solutions in world where everything is bound together, which is the foundation for taking a more pragmatic look at a solution for Irish Banks and households, because one inherently is reliant upon the other.
That our banks were underwritten by all of our citizens (minus any consent in that debt bondage process) is a given, however, it would be a mistake to think that there can only be a one way flow of funds or solutions between the two parties.
The conundrum thus far is that the ECB don’t want to see any bond holders ‘burned’, while at the same time this nation should not be guaranteeing any facet of the securities markets any more than we should have protected bank share holders; and then we have the third and fourth legs on this table of madness, the IMF who (counter to the ECB) want burden sharing and an overly indebted society incapable of paying back the money they borrowed.
Somehow within this morass we …